If that’s the case, then the ~128,000 people who participated in the Condé Nast TravelerReaders’ Choice Awards survey in 2015 must count for something when it comes to which cities are America’s friendliest.
… And the survey results show that if you want to find America’s friendliest folks, head south and west.
That is correct: Of the ten cities rated the most friendly, just one is located in the Northeast … and absolutely none are in the Midwest.
For the record, here are the ten friendliest American cities based on the Condé Nast survey:
#1 Charleston, SC — America’s friendliest city
#2 Park City, UT
#3 Savannah, GA
#4 Nashville, TN
#5 Austin, TX
#6 Santa Fe, NM
#7 Asheville, NC
#8 Jackson (Jackson Hole), WY
#9 New Orleans, LA
#10 Burlington, VT
Of course, there are also the ten unfriendliest cities as determined from the same survey — no doubt the subject of just as much curiosity.
Those seem to be just as clustered — but elsewhere — primarily in the Northeast, but also a few in California. And Detroit, too:
#1 Newark, NJ — America’s unfriendliest city
#2 Oakland, CA
#3 Atlantic City, NJ
#4 Detroit, MI
#5 Hartford, CT
#6 New Haven, CT
#7 Dover, DE
#8 Wilmington, DE
#9 Los Angeles, CA
#10 Baltimore, MD
I have no earthly idea if these rankings are accurate or not; it’s actually well-nigh impossible to have a definitive listing based on a ranking criterion that’s so subjective.
But having lived in both Nashville and Baltimore — and having visited 13 of the other 18 cities — I do get a sense of where the Condé Nast survey respondents are coming from.
How about you? Do you think that any of these cities are unfairly ranked? And what other cities do you think should have made it on either list? Like New York City or Philadelphia, for instance?
Incidentally, the 2016 Readers’ Choice Survey results are currently being tabulated and are due to be published in October. It will be interesting to see if there are any big changes in the listings …
Which cities in America are the “most sinful” of the bunch? Perhaps they’re the ones whose monikers or mottos seem to suggest as much:
Always turned on.
Big beach. Big fun.
The city that never sleeps.
Live large. Think big.
More than you ever dreamed.
Town on the make.
What happens here, stays here.
What we dream, we do.
The wickedest little city in America.
While some of the descriptions above hardly represent what city boosters would want to convey about their burgs, a surprising number of them are actually the end-result of formal marketing and branding efforts – focus-group tested and all.
[How many cities do you think you can name for these slogans?]
But put all of that aside now … because the online residential real estate website Trulia has been busy doing its own analysis of which cities qualify as being among the nation’s most “sinful.” Earlier this month, it published its listing of the ten most “sinful cities” in the United States.
Next, it used a variety of data such as drinking habits, the number of adult entertainment venues and the number of gambling establishments to determine the cities where it’s easiest to succumb to the eight deadly sins – among them gluttony, greed, lust, sloth and vanity.
For each “offense,” Trulia examined statistical measures that serve as key clues – stats like how many adult entertainment venues there are (for lust), and exercise statistics (for sloth).
Obviously, a mega-city like New York or Los Angeles is going to offer many more outlets catering to the sinful nature of mankind compared to smaller urban centers. So Tulia has “common-sized” the data based on per capita population, making it possible to determine the destination in which it’s easiest to satisfy one’s whims (or vices).
So – drumroll please – here’s the resulting Trulia Top Ten, listed below beginning with #10 and moving up to the ignominious honor of being the most sinful city of the bunch:
#10 Columbus, OH
#9 San Antonio, TX
#8 Las Vegas, NV
#7 Shreveport, LA
#6 Louisville, KY
#5 Toledo, OH
#4 Tampa, FL
#3 Philadelphia, PA
#2 Atlantic City, NJ
#1 New Orleans, LA
I suppose few people would quarrel with New Orleans coming in at #1 on the list; anyone who has spent any time in that city knows must know how much of an “anything goes” atmosphere exists there. (Few tourists seem to avert their eyes to what they see, either.)
Atlantic City? Las Vegas? Pretty much the same thing.
But what about Louisville, or Toledo, or … Shreveport?? OMG!
Of course, the same statistics Trulia crunched to determine who sits atop the “Sin City” list also reveal which cities are their polar opposites – the places Trulia calls America’s “saintly sanctuaries.”
Which cities are those? Here’s that list:
#10 Cambridge, MA
#9 Greeley, CO
#8 Asheville, NC
#7 Boise, ID
#6 Claremont-Lebanon, NH
#5 Raleigh, NC
#4 Tuscaloosa, AL
#3 Ft. Collins, CO
#2 Ogden, UT
#1 Provo, UT
I think fewer surprises are on this list.
For details on the Trulia analysis and to read more about the methodology employed, click here.
What’s your take? Based on your own personal observations or even first-hand experience, which cities would you characterize as the most “sinful” … and the most “saintly”? We’re all interested to know!
While there’s been evidence of significant shifts in U.S. population growth over the past decade, the decennial census performed earlier this year gives us an opportunity to learn precisely what’s been happening and end some of the “speculation.”
And now, with the U.S. Census Bureau releasing its preliminary population reports, we’re seeing how this has played out in cities across the country. While it’s true that the American population has grown pretty steadily at about 2.5 million people per year, some areas have grown much faster than others as a result of being better positioned through the education of their workforce and/or their business- and technology-friendly environments.
Alas, other areas haven’t merely stagnated, but actually lost residents because of failing industries and unattractive business climates, sparking net out-migration of their residents.
Interestingly, many of the cities in the “industrial heartland” of America have managed to stay on the positive side of population growth – even if just barely. But some cities have experienced such hardship that their populations have dropped dramatically in the past decade.
New Orleans tops the list … and who’s surprised about that? After all, Hurricane Katrina effectively robbed the city of one-third of its residents – with most of them electing not to return after establishing new livelihoods in Houston, Shreveport, and other localities further yon.
But New Orleans surely represents a “special case” if ever there was one. Other cities have suffered greatly due to their dependence on industries that took a beating over the past decade. And really, any city with a major focus on traditional manufacturing saw thousands of jobs disappear.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Census report on the nation’s largest cities — ones with 100,000+ population — the seven experiencing the biggest percentage declines in population over the past decade are:
1. New Orleans, LA – Dropped by ~129,000 to ~355,000 (-27%) 2. Flint, MI – Declined by ~13,000 to ~112,000 (-11%) 3. Cleveland, OH – Fell by ~45,000 to ~431,000 (-10%) 4. Buffalo, NY – Dropped by ~22,000 to ~270,000 (-8%) 5. Dayton, OH – Declined by ~12,000 to ~154,000 (-7%) 6. Pittsburgh, PA – Dropped by ~22,000 to ~312,000 (-7%) 7. Rochester, NY – Declined by ~12,000 to ~207,000 (-6%)
[I was a bit surprised to see Detroit missing from this list. After all, it’s the poster child for urban decay and depopulation. But Detroit’s population percentage decline was actually smaller than the cities above, and it remains the nation’s 11th largest city. However, the 2010 census will likely show that its population has fallen below 800,000 for the first time in nearly a century – and the figure is even more startling when you realize the city’s population was nearly 2 million as late as the 1950 census.]
Unfortunately, the negative implication of population declines in these proud American cities go far beyond the loss of social prestige and political clout.
Once decline sets in, it can go on for years. The loss of residents contributes to a drop in tax receipts and the subsequent curtailing of social services ranging from police and sanitation to schools and recreation. Home vacancy rates say volumes about the precarious position in which the cities above find themselves – they’re above 15% in every single case (and sometimes dramatically higher).
Confronted with such a reality, too often the result is more people fleeing the urban core, creating a continuing downward spiral that seemingly has no bottom. Representative examples of where this sorry state of affairs can end up can be found in two smaller but particularly grim urban communities: Camden, NJ and Chester, PA.
From the outside looking in, it’s difficult to accept these population reports … and it seems like people should step in and do something – anything – to arrest the decline.
And in the abstract, it’s only natural to feel that this is what should happen. But in the “real world,” who are going to be the ones to step up to the plate and expose themselves (and their families) to the harsh reality of urban pioneering?
Would I do it? Would you?
For most of us, the answer to that question falls into the “life’s too short” category.