One of the most recent research studies surveyed ~4,000 adults who work in offices and found that employees dislike open office concepts for a host of reasons, including:
- Lack of privacy
- Interruption and/or distraction from fellow employees
- Noise levels
- Inescapable odors
- Temperature control issues
In fact, feelings run so strongly against open offices that employees would prefer to give up the following perks as a tradeoff:
- Vacation days
- Year-end bonus
- Office coffee machine
- Access to a window or natural light
And for the cherry on top, a significant percentage of respondents claimed that an open office environment would be a deal-breaker when considering a new job — either inside their current company or going someplace else.
At a time when companies are having a difficult time finding qualified candidates to fill open positions, that factor is perhaps the most impactful one of all.
Against this backdrop of “passive-aggressive” attitudes about open-plan workspaces, many companies keep on merrily designing open-office environments or renovating existing spaces to conform to new open-plan design schemes.
Purportedly the reason for open office environments is to save money — but is that really the case? It’s true that some building and partition costs can be reduced, but how about the impact on worker productivity?
Actually, there’s another, perhaps unspoken reason why companies love open offices: they can monitor (read: spy on) their employees more easily. That’s something most people find quite distasteful — at least here in America where “individualism” continues to thrive as a bedrock cultural principle. And the plain truth is that people like having some control over their workspace. After all, it’s a place where they spend eight hours of every workday.
But even with these basic truisms at work, there are new developments that could be changing the whole notion of the office environment. It’s more than just conceivable that we’ll be seeing more spaces adapt to accommodate workers who move from environment to environment based on the needs of the moment.
As more of the “guts” of the office are housed electronically — and portably — the whole notion of a “home desk” may be becoming less and less relevant. Jay Osgerby, a partner in workspace design firm Barber & Osgerby puts it this way:
“The desk is dead. I don’t even know if the office building as we know it today will be in existence.”
I’m not at all sure that Osgerby’s prediction will come true any time soon. Who knows, his view might turn out to be as off-base as the open-office concept. But it is interesting to observe how the office environment is changing as the nature of business evolves.
What about your own office environment? What’s good and not-so-good about the concept? What sort of personal horror stories do you have — or conversely, do you have good tales to tell? Please share your observations with other readers here.