There’s no denying the benefits of social media in enabling people to make new friendships, reconnect with old acquaintances, and nurture existing relationships.
Facebook and other social platforms make it easier than ever to maintain “in the moment” connections with people the world over.
Speaking for myself, my immediate relatives who live in foreign lands seem so much closer because of social media.
Plus, thanks to social media, I’ve met other relatives from several different countries for the very first time. This would never have happened in the pre-Facebook era.
But there are downsides to social media, too – and I’ve written about them on this blog on occasion; for example, whether social media is a platform for narcissists.
Other negative consequences of social media have been noted by numerous observers of consumer online behaviors, including Canadian digital marketing company Mediative’s Senior Vice President and online marketing über-specialist Gord Hotchkiss.
In a recently published column by Hotchkiss headlined “The Stress of Hyper-Success,” he posits that self-regard and personal perspectives of “success” are relative. Here’s a critical passage from what he writes:
“We can only judge it [success] by looking at others. This creates a problem, because increasingly, we’re looking at extreme outliers as our baseline for expectations.”
Hotchkiss’ contention is that social media engenders feelings of stress in many people that would not occur otherwise.
Pinterest is a example. A recent survey of ~7,000 U.S. mothers conducted by Today.com found that ~42% of respondents suffer from this social media-induced stress; it’s the notion that they can’t live up to the ideal suggested by the images of domestic bliss posted on the female-dominated Pinterest social network.
Facebook causes a similar reaction in many; Hotchkiss reports on a survey showing that one-third of Facebook users “feel worse” after visiting the site.
It may not be hard to figure out why, either, as visitors are often confronted with too-good-to-be-true photo galleries chronicling friends’ lavish vacations, social gatherings, over-the-top wedding ceremonies, etc.
It’s only natural for people to focus their attention on the “extraordinary” posts of this type … and to discount the humdrum posts focusing on the mundane aspects of daily life.
Just like in the national or local news, people tend to focus on personal news items that are exceptional – the activities that are set far apart from the average.
Wall Street Journal report Meghan McBride Kelly has come up with a pretty interesting way to address social media stress: She quit Facebook earlier this year after a nine-year run. McBride contends that “Aristotle wouldn’t ‘friend’ you on Facebook,” writing:
“Aristotle wrote that friendship involves a degree of love. If we were to ask ourselves whether all of our Facebook friends were those we loved, we’d certainly answer that they’re not. These days, we devote equal if not more time to tracking the people we have had very limited interaction with than to those whom we truly love.”
Likewise, Hotchkiss tries to head us off at the social media pass:
“Somewhere, a resetting of expectations is required before we self-destruct because of hyper-competitiveness in trying to reach an unreachable goal. To end on a gratuitous pop culture quote, courtesy of Sheryl Crow: ‘It’s not having what you want. It’s wanting what you got.”
What are your thoughts about “social media stress disorder”? Please share your observations with other readers here.
2 thoughts on ““Social Media Stress Syndrome”: Real or Fake?”
I left Facebook last year and while I admit there have been times since then when I’ve felt “out of the loop”, I’m glad I did, for many of the reasons you wrote about here. I wrote about it my blog last year:
We’ve had three “revolutions” that have dramatically changed the global economic and social landscape: two industrial ones and, more recently, a technological one.
Interestingly, all of them also have resulted in explosive urbanization. The first two saw millions flock to cites in search of new jobs. The third has created a vast virtual conurbation with its own peculiar dynamics.
Urbanization has always resulted in alienation and certain dislocations. Virtual urbanization is no exception. Now we see relationships without any of the obligations of friendship, people retreating into special-interest communities — some sinister — where they can pow-wow (anonymously if they want) the issues mentioned above, with throngs of people and companies trying to shout over each other, saying ‘look at me!’
It’s a new anarchic Gotham with a vibrant energy, endless possibilities — and an enormous underbelly.