For some time now, we’ve been hearing the contention made that social media causes people to become angry or depressed.
One aspect of this phenomenon, the argument goes, is the “politicization” of social media — most recently exhibited in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Another aspect is the notion that since so many people engage in never-ending “happy talk” on social media — presenting their activities and their lives as a constant stream of oh-so-fabulous experiences — it’s only natural that those who encounter those social posts invariably become depressed when comparing them to their own dreary lives that come up wanting.
But much of this line of thought has been mere conjecture, awaiting analysis by social scientists.
One other question I’ve had in my mind is one of causation: Even if you believe that social media contributes to feelings of depression and/or anger, is using social media what makes people feel depressed … or are people who are prone to depression or anger the very people who are more likely to use social media in the first place?
Recently, we’ve begun to see some research work that is pointing to the causation — and the finding that social media does actually contribute to negative mental health for some users of social media.
One such study appeared in the February 2017 issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology. Titled “Association of Facebook Use with Compromised Well-Being: A Longitudinal Study,” the paper presents findings from three sets of data collected from ~5,200 subjects in Gallup’s Social Network panel.
The researchers — Drs. Holly Shakya and Nicholas Christakis — studied the relationships between Facebook activity over time with self-reported measures such as physical health, mental health and overall life satisfaction. There were other, more objective measures that were part of the analysis as well, such as weight and BMI information.
The study detected a correlation between increased Facebook activity and negative impacts on the well-being of the research subjects. ore specifically, certain users who practiced the following social media behaviors more often (within one standard deviation) …
- Liking social posts
- Following links on Facebook
- Updating their own social status frequently
… showed a decrease of 5% to 8% of a standard deviation in their emotional well-being.
As it turns out, the same correlation also applied when tracking people who migrated from light to moderate Facebook usage; these individuals were prone to suffer negative mental health impacts similar to the subjects who gravitated from moderate to heavy Facebook usage.
The Shakya/Christakis study presented several hypotheses seeking to explain the findings, including:
- Social media usage comes at the expense of “real world,” face-to-face interactions.
- Social media usage undermines self-esteem by triggering users to compare their own lives with the carefully constructed pictures presented by their social media contacts.
But what about that? It could be argued that heavy social media users are spending a good deal more time engaged in an activity which by definition is a pretty sedentary one. Might the decreased physical activity of heavy social media users have a negative impact on mental health and well-being, too?
We won’t know anything much more definitive until the Shakya/Christakis study can be replicated in another longitudinal research study. However, it’s often quite difficult to replicate such findings in subsequent research, where results can be affected by how the questions are asked, how random the sample really is, and so forth.
I’m sure there are many social scientists who are itching to settle these fundamental questions about social media, but we might be waiting a bit longer; these research endeavors aren’t as tidy a process as one might think.
Nones Notes 
There’s another issue: The more you use Facebook, the less control you have.
This is the reverse of almost anything else in life, where practice brings mastery and a sense of satisfaction. No wonder people get depressed! The more posts you “Like”, the more comments you make or comment upon, the more lost and frustrated you become. All you receive in return is even more political ulcers from more people, more pictures of half-eaten meals and more pets you wish someone HAD eaten!
Using Facebook is like discovering all your friends have showed up on the lawn at the same time for the party you aren’t throwing. There is no way to cope with all of them. Facebook guarantees a sense of failure.
I know a number of people who have either gotten off of social media or “unfriended”or “unfollowed” half of their friends within the past year. Many said that Facebook made them feel negative and worried. Much of this has to do with the political 24-hr. news cycle.
Others said that it made them envious and dissatisfied with their own lives.
My own conclusion is that if you tend to be more emotional than pragmatic, news/opinion vs. food/puppies is harder to take on a daily basis.
I have a friend who is pretty cynical and sarcastic (his FB persona only) and once in a while he will post his “obligatory food picture.” I find that humorous, but others feel as though he is making fun of their food posts.