Skip to content

Nones Notes

Thoughts and perspectives on the ever-changing business and cultural landscape.

  • Home
HomePosts tagged 'GetResponse'

GetResponse

What’s the half-life of an e-mail message?

November 4, 2012November 8, 2012 Phillip Nones Uncategorized Advertising, e-Mail Engagement, E-Mail Marketing, GetResponse, Marcomm, marketing, marketing communications, Nones, Open Rates, Phillip Nones

Declining e-mail open rates by hourThere’s been a good deal of discussion lately about the visibility and value of a Facebook or a Twitter post. It turns out that a Facebook post has a “shelf life” of approximately 18 hours: If your intended target hasn’t viewed it by then, chances are he or she won’t end up reading it at all.

For Twitter posts, the “useful life” is even less. Generally speaking, once your Twitter post scrolls off the viewing screen due to more recent posts coming in, it’s likely never to be viewed.

But what about e-mail messages? Seeing as how they’re targeted specifically to their recipient, surely they’re more likely to be viewed even after a lapse of time, correct?

Yes and no.

To some degree, the dynamics of an e-mail message means that recipients see them as “important” in the way that a Twitter or Facebook post might not be.  However, with the plethora of e-mails being sent by retailers and other vendors – something this cheap to do is usually worth almost as much as it costs, after all – people have become less prone to view all of their e-mails.

GetResponse, an e-mail marketing firm, has also found that timing is a significant factor that affects open and engagement rates for e-mail marketing campaigns.

GetResponse researched e-mail campaigns covering the 1st Quarter of 2012 to determine how the time of day affects open rates. It found that two factors have the most influence:

  • When the e-mail was sent
  • The amount of time that elapses from when the e-mail is sent to when the recipient checks his or her inbox

It turns out that morning e-mail deployments are most popular for senders (~39% of e-mail campaigns are deployed in the morning), while afternoon deployments occur in ~26% of the cases and ~30% are deployed in the evening. (The balance happens between midnight and 6:00 am).

Interestingly, GetResponse found that “morning” opens and clickthrough rates are actually somewhat lower than those sent at other times of the day – particularly in the afternoons: Top e-mail open hours are 3:00 pm and 4:00 pm and top clickthrough rates are at 3:00 pm and 8:00 pm.

These results, coupled with the fact that more sending activity occurs in the mornings, would suggest that deploying in the afternoons would be better for engagement and to “avoid the noise.”

GetResponse surmises that the volume of e-mails deployed during the morning hours makes it more likely that recipients skip over a bigger portion of those e-mails.

But another key finding from the research is that an e-mail message is most likely to be opened within one hour of delivery (~24% of the time).

Within the second hour, that open rate declines by half, and by the third hour, it drops by an additional 30%.

By the time the fifth hour is reached, virtually no new open activity is being recorded. So it’s safe to conclude that e-mail engagement behavior isn’t really all that different from what happens with Facebook posts.

There are a couple of takeaways from the GetResponse research. Vendors should consider making afternoon deployments in addition to ones in the morning.

Also, in order to increase the likelihood that e-mails are opened within the first hour of receipt, stagger deployments by time zones (including international recipients) to conform to the best times of the day for engagement.

In the end, does getting e-mail messages into inboxes during the most receptive times for engagement make that much of a difference?  GetResponse’s conclusion is that it isn’t inconsequential:  Average open rates and clickthrough rates can be lifted by ~6%. 

On the margins, that’s pretty decent.

Share this:

  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Leave a comment

Recent Posts

  • How to be behind the eight-ball in Davos. April 11, 2022
  • The 2020-21 COVID-19 and 1918-19 Spanish Flu epidemics: How do they compare? November 15, 2021
  • Predicting company misconduct before it even happens … really? October 12, 2021
  • When will U.S. employment dynamics change? October 5, 2021
  • Online search:  So fast … so convenient … so imperfect. September 21, 2021
  • Another COVID consequence: Consumer preferences for text communications just got a lot more pervasive. September 13, 2021
  • Arguing, finger-pointing, and other nasties. September 1, 2021
  • Another summer of natural disasters — and still too few people heed the warnings. August 24, 2021
  • The COVID-related product shortages that just won’t go away. August 16, 2021
  • In a twist, “working from home” benefits big tech in big ways. August 8, 2021
  • Not so neat: The rise of the NEET generation. July 5, 2021
  • In-flight magazines disappear into thin air. June 22, 2021
  • Is FedEx losing its luster in the package delivery field? June 8, 2021
  • A second look at the prospects for persistent price inflation in our future. May 30, 2021
  • That 70s Show: Inflation is back. May 24, 2021
  • The debate over social media’s effectiveness continues. May 18, 2021
  • The predictable — and unexpected — economic consequences of COVID. May 4, 2021
  • COVID Casualty: Homogenous Corporate Swag April 26, 2021
  • COVID Casualty: Office Gossip April 19, 2021
  • Robots become humans – at least in the eyes of the law. April 12, 2021
  • The consequences of COVID on office space leasing. April 5, 2021
  • Advertising’s COVID Consolidation March 28, 2021
  • Have we finally reached “peak oil”? March 21, 2021
  • America turns the corner on air travel. March 15, 2021
  • Changing the “work-live location paradigm” in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. March 9, 2021
  • Tissue issue: Explaining the curious connection between the coronavirus pandemic and toilet paper shortages. February 22, 2021
  • “You are what you wear.” February 15, 2021
  • The ripple effects — good and bad — of the COVID-19 pandemic on our health and wellness. February 9, 2021
  • Education alert: The unintended consequences of schools’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic. January 30, 2021
  • In the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, where are trade shows headed? January 26, 2021

Top Posts & Pages

  • Advertising that's really on a roll.
    Advertising that's really on a roll.
  • Where do people spend their time online?
    Where do people spend their time online?
  • Which are the 10 Scariest Airports in America?
    Which are the 10 Scariest Airports in America?
  • Online ad blocking grows ever-more popular.
    Online ad blocking grows ever-more popular.
  • The fundamental problem with newspapers’ online endeavors.
    The fundamental problem with newspapers’ online endeavors.
  • Notre-Dame Cathedral, an iconic structure built for the ages, survives.
    Notre-Dame Cathedral, an iconic structure built for the ages, survives.
  • The “woke” workplace?  Employees vote thumbs-down.
    The “woke” workplace? Employees vote thumbs-down.
  • Optify Measures the Current State of B-to-B Online Marketing
    Optify Measures the Current State of B-to-B Online Marketing
  • Is FedEx losing its luster in the package delivery field?
    Is FedEx losing its luster in the package delivery field?
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Nones Notes
    • Join 708 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Nones Notes
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: